Let’s make it official: climate change/global warming activists aren’t in search of truth, care little about the stain the leaked emails have done to the credibility of existing research and data regarding weather patterns. This is all about the United Nations sticking it to industrialized nations and extract as much of our money as they can, with the power to take as much as they like whenever they like.
So, the problem is that the scientists who rigged numbers and considered destroying evidence sought in a Freedom of Information request weren’t “discreet”.
The bonehead added…
Now I’m no climate scientist, but how can you have “peer reviewed” anything if you have nothing to review…?
I really hope the next Republican congress, senate, and president votes to de-fund the United Nations’ residency here in America so we can kick these lying, diplomatically-immune weasels out of our country, once and for all.
I really think people should be discreet … in this day and age anything you write, even privately, could become public and to put anything down in writing is, to say the least, indiscreet … It is another matter to talk about this to your friends on the telephone or person to person but to put it down in writing was indiscreet. If someone was to say something like this in an IPCC authors’ meeting then there are others who would chew him up.
— Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
So, the problem is that the scientists who rigged numbers and considered destroying evidence sought in a Freedom of Information request weren’t “discreet”.
The bonehead added…
Every single comment that an expert reviewer provides has to be answered either by acceptance of the comment, or if it is not accepted, the reasons have to be clearly specified. So I think it is a very transparent, a very comprehensive process which insures that even if someone wants to leave out a piece of peer reviewed literature there is virtually no possibility of that happening.
Now I’m no climate scientist, but how can you have “peer reviewed” anything if you have nothing to review…?
Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
I really hope the next Republican congress, senate, and president votes to de-fund the United Nations’ residency here in America so we can kick these lying, diplomatically-immune weasels out of our country, once and for all.
Source:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17400
